When I speak of "historical precedents" occurring in the past that can be repeated at intervals of seven years or multiples of seven years (the "base 7 phenomenon"), they are not only events (earthquakes, wars, incursions, ceasefires, comets, asteroids, novae, floods, acts of terrorism, etc.), but are also people. When a human being sets a precedent regarding their own personae that can be repeated again (and maybe again and again) in the future, particularly a figure found in Prophecy, that person is said to be an archetype or prototype.
The two most important definitions of "archetype" for our purposes are to be found in Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archetype): "1.a statement, pattern of behavior, or prototype (model) which other statements, patterns of behavior, and objects copy or emulate. (Frequently used informal synonyms for this usage include "standard example", "basic example", and the longer form "archetypal example"). 4.a constantly recurring symbol or motif in literature, painting, or mythology (this usage of the term draws from both comparative anthropology and from Jungian archetypal theory). In various seemingly unrelated cases in classic storytelling, media, etc., characters or ideas sharing similar traits recur."
The characters or figures recur again and again, in other words ... or possibly only once again.
Nostradamus was especially interested in archetypes that would prefigure the arrival of the beast of Revelation 13. He called these archetypes "antichrists": a series of male leaders, including their associated empires, regimes, and revolutions, who would more and more as time went by resemble the final fulfillment of Biblical prophecy known as the beast and his empire, and who Nostradamus called "Antichrist, the Infernal Prince" at the end of his prose prophecy found in the Epistle to Henry II.
The two most important definitions of "archetype" for our purposes are to be found in Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archetype): "1.a statement, pattern of behavior, or prototype (model) which other statements, patterns of behavior, and objects copy or emulate. (Frequently used informal synonyms for this usage include "standard example", "basic example", and the longer form "archetypal example"). 4.a constantly recurring symbol or motif in literature, painting, or mythology (this usage of the term draws from both comparative anthropology and from Jungian archetypal theory). In various seemingly unrelated cases in classic storytelling, media, etc., characters or ideas sharing similar traits recur."
The characters or figures recur again and again, in other words ... or possibly only once again.
Nostradamus was especially interested in archetypes that would prefigure the arrival of the beast of Revelation 13. He called these archetypes "antichrists": a series of male leaders, including their associated empires, regimes, and revolutions, who would more and more as time went by resemble the final fulfillment of Biblical prophecy known as the beast and his empire, and who Nostradamus called "Antichrist, the Infernal Prince" at the end of his prose prophecy found in the Epistle to Henry II.
Shortly after Princess Diana died on August 31, 1997 (still in the late PM hours of August 30 in the United States), a strange idea began to emerge on and off the internet ... which I would not have access to until 1999. That idea was, since we were supposedly living in the "end times," that she was the "woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet" who appears in Revelation 12. It was an idea even I would buy into for a time. It was rumored she was pregnant at the time, and the belief was that she had been murdered in a staged but fatal "accident" under the Pont de l'Alma by the Illuminati (an unfamiliar name I would be hearing more and more about as time went by). The "moon under her feet" supposedly related to her name, Diana, the moon goddess. The baby she was carrying, a male, was brought up to Heaven along with Diana because according to Revelation 12 the woman "brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne." During the time of the Merovingian kings, disputes were settled in combat at Pont de l'Alma. According to legend, anyone killed there went directly to Heaven and sat at the right hand of God. It was also rumored that Diana was descended directly from the Merovingian bloodline. So, when she was killed under the Pont de l'Alma, it was said that she and her unborn child went directly to Heaven in the same manner as the Merovingian legend and as the child goes in Revelation 12.
The big problem with this is that the woman of Revelation 12 IS NOT KILLED! Instead she flees into the wilderness where there is a place prepared for her and lives there in hiding for 1,260 days (3.45 years ... not quite 3 1/2 years). While she is in hiding a war in heaven is witnessed worldwide between the Devil and his angels and Michael and his angels. At the conclusion, the Devil and his angels are cast down to earth, never again allowed to roam outer space. Once vanquished and earthbound, he sends out his agents after the woman yet again! Once more she escapes for yet another 3 1/2 years. Then he gets really serious and attacks her with a flood, but fails. He continues to war with her and her children (apparently she managed to have other children before the one caught up to Heaven) until the end of time.
That is what is wrong with the "Diana as Woman of Revelation 12 theory." She did not escape for 3 1/2 years and again for another 3 1/2 years and longer. She was fatally wounded on the spot and died a few hours later in the hospital.
So, Princess Diana could not be the woman of Revelation 12. However, in all respects but for one, she can be considered as an archetype for the woman of Revelation 12. Possibly Diana is the ONLY archetype, thus the first prototype, since as far as I know no other historical female personages prior to Diana have ever come close to being the woman of Revelation 12.
The big problem with this is that the woman of Revelation 12 IS NOT KILLED! Instead she flees into the wilderness where there is a place prepared for her and lives there in hiding for 1,260 days (3.45 years ... not quite 3 1/2 years). While she is in hiding a war in heaven is witnessed worldwide between the Devil and his angels and Michael and his angels. At the conclusion, the Devil and his angels are cast down to earth, never again allowed to roam outer space. Once vanquished and earthbound, he sends out his agents after the woman yet again! Once more she escapes for yet another 3 1/2 years. Then he gets really serious and attacks her with a flood, but fails. He continues to war with her and her children (apparently she managed to have other children before the one caught up to Heaven) until the end of time.
That is what is wrong with the "Diana as Woman of Revelation 12 theory." She did not escape for 3 1/2 years and again for another 3 1/2 years and longer. She was fatally wounded on the spot and died a few hours later in the hospital.
So, Princess Diana could not be the woman of Revelation 12. However, in all respects but for one, she can be considered as an archetype for the woman of Revelation 12. Possibly Diana is the ONLY archetype, thus the first prototype, since as far as I know no other historical female personages prior to Diana have ever come close to being the woman of Revelation 12.
Archetypes that recur throughout history can have many similarities, but they will also have some notable differences.
Over eleven years ago, I came to the conclusion that pop icon Madonna was an archetype of the Whore of Babylon, at least the one that appears in Revelation 17. However, whenever it seemed we were on the verge of seeing "end times" prophecy fulfilled, it became clear she might be the actual figure of prophecy.
In our "entertainment level" age, it is hardly surprising that a pop singer/actress named Madonna has played the role of our modern Whore of Babylon since at least 1993, or as early as the 1980s. However, in Revelation 18, the Whore of Babylon has always been treated as the leader of a great nation, a queen of the mightiest and wealthiest nation on the planet. This has always led me to believe that there might be two whores of Babylon. However, something has changed that view and I find that it is possible for one person to fulfill both prophecies, especially a goddess queen.
Over eleven years ago, I came to the conclusion that pop icon Madonna was an archetype of the Whore of Babylon, at least the one that appears in Revelation 17. However, whenever it seemed we were on the verge of seeing "end times" prophecy fulfilled, it became clear she might be the actual figure of prophecy.
In our "entertainment level" age, it is hardly surprising that a pop singer/actress named Madonna has played the role of our modern Whore of Babylon since at least 1993, or as early as the 1980s. However, in Revelation 18, the Whore of Babylon has always been treated as the leader of a great nation, a queen of the mightiest and wealthiest nation on the planet. This has always led me to believe that there might be two whores of Babylon. However, something has changed that view and I find that it is possible for one person to fulfill both prophecies, especially a goddess queen.
In any event, regarding the whore of Babylon as a goddess or high priestess, I concluded Madonna was not the very first archetype. The first in recent history, according to Wikipedia, was Sophie Momoro, the wife of the printer Antoine-François Momoro, whom the French Revolutionaries augured and enthroned as the Goddess of Reason at the cathedral of Notre Dame in Paris on November 10, 1793. However there are two contradictary claims: 1) an unknown, half-clothed or nude prostitute who was enthroned upon or laid across the famous altar 2) Marie-Therese Davoux (aka Mademoiselle Maillard), a French opera singer and dancer, also elevated on a throne above the altar.
I rather suspect it was the nameless prostitute they "worshipped" and likely engaged in "sacred sex" with as an ultimate stab at Christianity and the Church during what was the dechristianisation of France. Until Robespierre attempted to institute an official state religion with his Festival of the Supreme Being in June 1794, there were numerous Goddesses of Reason throughout France dressed (or partially unclothed) in ancient Roman garb, many of them prostitutes. The atrocities, tortures, rapes, and beheadings committed throughout France during this Cult of Reason ... the same bloodlust attributed to the Whore of Babylon in Revelation 17 ... can be matched only by the barbaric acts of horror committed by ISIS in the Middle East and (already) in parts of Europe, again most notably in France. See EXCLUSIVE: France ‘Suppressed Reports of Gruesome Torture’ at Bataclan Massacre.
The original "whore of Babylon" goes back to ancient Babylon and Queen Semiramis, consort of King Ninus (Nimrod). Ninus claimed to be the son of the god Bel (Ba'al). Semiramis claimed to be the human representative of the goddess Ishtar (whose Egyptian goddess predecessor was ISIS). Much sacred sex occurred between her holy prostitutes and the males during religious rites, and much bloodletting at festivals, including the tearing apart of animals while still alive (and then eaten) and the castration of young men and boys. Semiramis reigned for 42 years and led the armies of Babylon into warfare where much blood was shed.
Thus, Semiramis was regarded as a head-of-state (queen) and as a goddess.
Semiramis had a number of young women serve as priestesses and has sacred prostitutes. They were accorded all the same honors and worship as the queen, engaging in ritual sex and orgies with males and females alike.
Thus, Semiramis was regarded as a head-of-state (queen) and as a goddess.
Semiramis had a number of young women serve as priestesses and has sacred prostitutes. They were accorded all the same honors and worship as the queen, engaging in ritual sex and orgies with males and females alike.
It is not surprising that, like the priestesses of Semiramis, or the various women who played the role of the Goddess of Reason in 1793-94 in France, there are other modern "whores" of Babylon, such as Katy Perry, Britney Spears, Lady Gaga, Rihanna, and so many others. Much of the occult and of sexual debauchery has been associated with these and never more so than with Madonna, former high priestess of the Hollywood branch of Kabbalah, sorceress and master practitioner (witch) of black magic, and self-appointed, Illuminati-appointed goddess augered during the 2012 Superbowl halftime show ... a failed effort at making Madonna a god.
No, neither Madonna or any of the aforementioned Hollywood harlots have, as best as we can determine, dyed their lips red drinking from a chalice filled with the blood of Christians. Of course, no one knows what secretly goes on behind locked doors (see the films Hostel and Hostel 2). But again, this is the age of "entertainment" where these things can be enacted in fantasy by actresses and, in an odd twist, female pop singers. And we have seen a lot of evil intention "played out" over the last decade or so.
However, in real terms, it would not surprise me in the least if there are female members of ISIS/ISIL who have done exactly that: drink from cups the blood taken from beheaded victims.
In any event, ISIS excluded for now, I have given three examples of how three different archetypes of the Whore of Babylon have had much in common, yet have had notable differences as well.
No, neither Madonna or any of the aforementioned Hollywood harlots have, as best as we can determine, dyed their lips red drinking from a chalice filled with the blood of Christians. Of course, no one knows what secretly goes on behind locked doors (see the films Hostel and Hostel 2). But again, this is the age of "entertainment" where these things can be enacted in fantasy by actresses and, in an odd twist, female pop singers. And we have seen a lot of evil intention "played out" over the last decade or so.
However, in real terms, it would not surprise me in the least if there are female members of ISIS/ISIL who have done exactly that: drink from cups the blood taken from beheaded victims.
In any event, ISIS excluded for now, I have given three examples of how three different archetypes of the Whore of Babylon have had much in common, yet have had notable differences as well.
Semiramis came to a wretched end at the hands of her son, so awful it is not worth mentioning. The architect of the Cult of Reason, and some of the whores he elevated, came to their ultimate endings via the sharp, bloody blade of Madame Guillotine.
What happens to the real Whore of Babylon when she finally arrives on the scene is quite horrific: "And the ten horns which thou sawest upon the beast, these shall hate the whore, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire." - Rev 17:16.
Pretty close to what happened to Semiramis.
But what will happen to our current archetype: Madonna? Or the other pop harlots who likewise pose as this figure?
Madonna has given some authority the pretext to end her life ... and it may not be the Illuminati. I have warned this day may come, and she may have hastened it:
What happens to the real Whore of Babylon when she finally arrives on the scene is quite horrific: "And the ten horns which thou sawest upon the beast, these shall hate the whore, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire." - Rev 17:16.
Pretty close to what happened to Semiramis.
But what will happen to our current archetype: Madonna? Or the other pop harlots who likewise pose as this figure?
Madonna has given some authority the pretext to end her life ... and it may not be the Illuminati. I have warned this day may come, and she may have hastened it:
In R-rated anti-Trump rant, Madonna muses about 'blowing up White House'
By Eric Levenson
Updated 2155 GMT (0555 HKT) January 21, 2017
(CNN) — Ever the provocateur, Madonna dropped a trio of f-bombs and admitted that she's "thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House" during a speech at the Women's March on Washington on Saturday.
"It took this horrific moment of darkness to wake us the f--k up," she told the crowd. "It seems as though we had all slipped into a false sense of comfort, that justice would prevail and that good would win in the end."
"Well, good did not win this election. But good will win in the end," she said.
The pop star later went into a rendition of "Human Nature" with added R-rated lyrics, including a call for Trump to perform an obscene act to himself.
Madonna, who supported Hillary Clinton during the campaign, was one of a number of celebrities on Saturday who spoke out as part of Women's Marches in cities across the world.
But of those high-profile speeches, Madonna's was particularly confrontational. She said that the march represented the beginning of a "revolution" and affirmed that "we will not back down."
"And to our detractors that insist that this march will never add up to anything: F--k you. F--k you," she said. "It is the beginning of much-needed change."
Madonna also said she was "angry" and "outraged" in the wake of Trump's inauguration.
"Yes, I'm angry. Yes, I am outraged. Yes, I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House," Madonna said. "But I know that this won't change anything. We cannot fall into despair."
By Eric Levenson
Updated 2155 GMT (0555 HKT) January 21, 2017
(CNN) — Ever the provocateur, Madonna dropped a trio of f-bombs and admitted that she's "thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House" during a speech at the Women's March on Washington on Saturday.
"It took this horrific moment of darkness to wake us the f--k up," she told the crowd. "It seems as though we had all slipped into a false sense of comfort, that justice would prevail and that good would win in the end."
"Well, good did not win this election. But good will win in the end," she said.
The pop star later went into a rendition of "Human Nature" with added R-rated lyrics, including a call for Trump to perform an obscene act to himself.
Madonna, who supported Hillary Clinton during the campaign, was one of a number of celebrities on Saturday who spoke out as part of Women's Marches in cities across the world.
But of those high-profile speeches, Madonna's was particularly confrontational. She said that the march represented the beginning of a "revolution" and affirmed that "we will not back down."
"And to our detractors that insist that this march will never add up to anything: F--k you. F--k you," she said. "It is the beginning of much-needed change."
Madonna also said she was "angry" and "outraged" in the wake of Trump's inauguration.
"Yes, I'm angry. Yes, I am outraged. Yes, I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House," Madonna said. "But I know that this won't change anything. We cannot fall into despair."
Madonna’s mouth gets the attention of Secret Service
Sarah Lee Jan 22, 2017 5:14 pm
According to the New York Post’s Page Six, Madonna’s inauguration day statements about “blowing up the White House” have gotten the attention of the Secret Service who are known to take any threatening statement seriously until they can establish intent.
From the Post:
One US official told The Post that Madonna’s statement will have be evaluated for its seriousness. “It’s all about intent. Is she intending to do harm to the White House or President Trump? Otherwise it will be characterized as inappropriate,” the official said. “If it’s characterized as inappropriate, then there won’t be any discussions with the U.S. Attorney. If it’s determined that there’s intent on her part, then there will be discussions with the U.S. Attorney and they’ll take it from there.”
Madonna’s comments, delivered at the Women’s March in Washington, D.C., on Saturday, were condemned by President Donald Trump’s administration, with White House Chief of Staff Reince Preibus telling “Fox News Sunday”: “One of the singers said she wanted to blow up the White House. I mean, can you imagine saying that about President Obama?”
Sarah Lee Jan 22, 2017 5:14 pm
According to the New York Post’s Page Six, Madonna’s inauguration day statements about “blowing up the White House” have gotten the attention of the Secret Service who are known to take any threatening statement seriously until they can establish intent.
From the Post:
One US official told The Post that Madonna’s statement will have be evaluated for its seriousness. “It’s all about intent. Is she intending to do harm to the White House or President Trump? Otherwise it will be characterized as inappropriate,” the official said. “If it’s characterized as inappropriate, then there won’t be any discussions with the U.S. Attorney. If it’s determined that there’s intent on her part, then there will be discussions with the U.S. Attorney and they’ll take it from there.”
Madonna’s comments, delivered at the Women’s March in Washington, D.C., on Saturday, were condemned by President Donald Trump’s administration, with White House Chief of Staff Reince Preibus telling “Fox News Sunday”: “One of the singers said she wanted to blow up the White House. I mean, can you imagine saying that about President Obama?”
The danger of being an archetype is that you may in some manner share the awful destiny awaiting the one you are prefiguring.
Robespierre came to a gruesome end, shot in the jaw (losing part of his chin in the process) and then beheaded on the guillotine. Napoleon withered away in exile on St. Helena. Hitler shot himself (or had someone do it for him) and then his body was burned. John F. Kennedy, who was a good man and a good leader but shared the charismatic element found in most antichrists, had part of his head and almost his entire brain blown away by an assassin. As a charismatic archetype, the manner of his death was the very same as that awaiting the true beast of Revelation who will receive a fatal head wound ... yet live. Saddam Hussein was executed by hanging, Gadhafi beaten to a pulp and shot dead, and the true father of ISIS, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, was killed when the house in which he was holding a meeting was bombed. His dead body was proudly placed on public display: a warning to the current leader of ISIS, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.
Only a few days ago I received an angry email calling for Madonna's death which I deleted. I should add that the person who wrote it did not make a direct threat on her life ... only wished someone would do it. My point for mentioning it is that Madonna's words and actions are being taken seriously by people who would now wish her dead, perhaps unstable people who might even consider murdering her. This was all in the realm of fantasy before, speculation from Nostradamus prophecies ... but now it's starting to get real.
We need only see what happened to Kim Kardashian to know something much worse can happen to someone else as famous or more famous.
No, she will not likely end like the woman in Revelation 17 ... after all, Madonna is only an archetype. But Nostradamus has prophesied of several women who will be archetypes of the Whore of Babylon. They all come to a bad end. And one of them is likely Madonna.
Robespierre came to a gruesome end, shot in the jaw (losing part of his chin in the process) and then beheaded on the guillotine. Napoleon withered away in exile on St. Helena. Hitler shot himself (or had someone do it for him) and then his body was burned. John F. Kennedy, who was a good man and a good leader but shared the charismatic element found in most antichrists, had part of his head and almost his entire brain blown away by an assassin. As a charismatic archetype, the manner of his death was the very same as that awaiting the true beast of Revelation who will receive a fatal head wound ... yet live. Saddam Hussein was executed by hanging, Gadhafi beaten to a pulp and shot dead, and the true father of ISIS, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, was killed when the house in which he was holding a meeting was bombed. His dead body was proudly placed on public display: a warning to the current leader of ISIS, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.
Only a few days ago I received an angry email calling for Madonna's death which I deleted. I should add that the person who wrote it did not make a direct threat on her life ... only wished someone would do it. My point for mentioning it is that Madonna's words and actions are being taken seriously by people who would now wish her dead, perhaps unstable people who might even consider murdering her. This was all in the realm of fantasy before, speculation from Nostradamus prophecies ... but now it's starting to get real.
We need only see what happened to Kim Kardashian to know something much worse can happen to someone else as famous or more famous.
No, she will not likely end like the woman in Revelation 17 ... after all, Madonna is only an archetype. But Nostradamus has prophesied of several women who will be archetypes of the Whore of Babylon. They all come to a bad end. And one of them is likely Madonna.
One is taken to be executed, but how is not said. Another is burned alive in Spain, whether by accident or artifice is uncertain. Yet another is strangled or hanged in her bedroom. Another is conspired against by an artisan (or an artist) and a monk in Italy. One dies in England when it is under attack. That is five different quatrains, but obviously at three different locations. So there will be at least two archetypes of the Whore of Babylon in present and future with a third in future being the actual figure from the Bible. That conceivably makes Madonna one of the two archetypes.
There may be more than five quatrains about this figure and her archetypes; but these five are all that occur to me at the moment. If there are more, then the number of archetypes may be three, four or more.
After all, if Nostradamus is to be believed, the real end times don't arrive until sometime in the mid-2230s ... well over two hundred years from now.
There may be more than five quatrains about this figure and her archetypes; but these five are all that occur to me at the moment. If there are more, then the number of archetypes may be three, four or more.
After all, if Nostradamus is to be believed, the real end times don't arrive until sometime in the mid-2230s ... well over two hundred years from now.
RSS Feed
